GOOY vs PJAN
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF vs Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - January
Which is better, GOOY or PJAN?
GOOY has been ahead.
PJAN has a lower expense ratio. GOOY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GOOY | PJAN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.14% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $230M | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 53.51% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 27 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +11.04%Best | +8.73% |
| 1Y Return | +32.83%Best | +11.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.62%Best | +13.11% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.18% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.4% | 6.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -10.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $18,176Best | $14,334 |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jul 27, 2023 | Dec 31, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 28, 2023 to Oct 15, 2026 (3.2 years).
GOOY vs PJAN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
GOOY vs PJAN Performance
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year GOOY returned +32.83% while PJAN returned +11.72%. Year to date, GOOY is up 11.04% versus a gain of 8.73% for PJAN.
Over three years, GOOY compounded at +20.62% per year against +13.11% for PJAN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GOOY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 6.5% for PJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for GOOY and -10.5% for PJAN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GOOY charges 1.14% per year while PJAN charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $114 vs $79 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GOOY currently yields 53.51% against 0.00% for PJAN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GOOY and PJAN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GOOY or PJAN?
GOOY has an expense ratio of 1.14% while PJAN charges 0.79%. PJAN is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GOOY or PJAN?
Over the past year GOOY returned +32.83% vs +11.72% for PJAN, so GOOY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GOOY or PJAN?
GOOY has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 6.5% for PJAN. Worst drawdown: GOOY -24.4% vs PJAN -10.5%.
Should I hold both GOOY and PJAN?
GOOY and PJAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GOOY or PJAN?
GOOY yields 53.51% while PJAN yields 0.00%, so GOOY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PJAN better than GOOY?
PJAN has a lower expense ratio. GOOY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.