GOOY vs PJUL
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF vs Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
Which is better, GOOY or PJUL?
GOOY has been ahead.
PJUL has a lower expense ratio. GOOY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GOOY | PJUL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.14% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $230M | $1.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 53.51% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 27 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +10.04%Best | +7.49% |
| 1Y Return | +33.27%Best | +9.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.28%Best | +13.56% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.66% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.4% | 6.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -10.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $18,022Best | $14,310 |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jul 27, 2023 | Aug 7, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 28, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.2 years).
GOOY vs PJUL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
GOOY vs PJUL Performance
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year GOOY returned +33.27% while PJUL returned +9.97%. Year to date, GOOY is up 10.04% versus a gain of 7.49% for PJUL.
Over three years, GOOY compounded at +20.28% per year against +13.56% for PJUL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GOOY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 6.6% for PJUL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for GOOY and -10.7% for PJUL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GOOY charges 1.14% per year while PJUL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $114 vs $79 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GOOY currently yields 53.51% against 0.00% for PJUL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GOOY and PJUL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GOOY or PJUL?
GOOY has an expense ratio of 1.14% while PJUL charges 0.79%. PJUL is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GOOY or PJUL?
Over the past year GOOY returned +33.27% vs +9.97% for PJUL, so GOOY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GOOY or PJUL?
GOOY has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 6.6% for PJUL. Worst drawdown: GOOY -24.4% vs PJUL -10.7%.
Should I hold both GOOY and PJUL?
GOOY and PJUL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GOOY or PJUL?
GOOY yields 53.51% while PJUL yields 0.00%, so GOOY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PJUL better than GOOY?
PJUL has a lower expense ratio. GOOY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.