GPIQ vs VYM
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GPIQ or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GPIQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GPIQ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $6.5B | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.86% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 216 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +17.61%Best | +11.83% |
| 1Y Return | +21.68%Best | +15.96% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.29%Best | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0% | 10.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.1% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $20,142Best | $17,319 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.9% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 26, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
GPIQ vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
GPIQ vs VYM Performance
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GPIQ returned +21.68% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, GPIQ is up 17.61% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Over three years, GPIQ compounded at +26.29% per year against +18.60% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GPIQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.0% compared with 10.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.1% for GPIQ and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GPIQ charges 0.29% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $4 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GPIQ currently yields 9.86% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
15.5% of GPIQ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 19.1% of VYM's money is in holdings GPIQ also owns.
VYM and GPIQ share little of their money.
27 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in GPIQ and 602 in VYM, against full books of 216 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 546 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GPIQ (78.8% of the fund), and 68 for GPIQ that do not appear in VYM (83.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GPIQ | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.55% | 6.94% | 4.39% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.72% | 1.76% | 0.04% |
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc | 1.05% | 0.96% | 0.09% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.92% | 0.91% | 0.01% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc | 0.93% | 0.86% | 0.07% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.12% |
| ADIAnalog Devices Inc | 0.83% | 0.71% | 0.12% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 0.77% | 0.73% | 0.04% |
| PEPPepsico Inc | 0.71% | 0.77% | 0.06% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing | 0.63% | 0.46% | 0.17% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GPIQ and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPIQ or VYM?
GPIQ has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GPIQ or VYM?
Over the past year GPIQ returned +21.68% vs +15.96% for VYM, so GPIQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GPIQ or VYM?
GPIQ has been the more volatile fund at 14.0% annualized versus 10.9% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GPIQ -21.1% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both GPIQ and VYM?
GPIQ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GPIQ and VYM?
19.1% of VYM's money is in holdings GPIQ also owns. 19.1% of VYM's is in holdings GPIQ also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in GPIQ and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GPIQ or VYM?
GPIQ yields 9.86% while VYM yields 2.37%, so GPIQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GPIQ?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GPIQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.