GQGU vs GRNY
GQG US Equity ETF vs Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Which is better, GQGU or GRNY?
GRNY has been ahead.
GQGU has a lower expense ratio. GRNY led over 1Y and the full window. GRNY is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GQGU | GRNY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $584M | $4.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 0.13% |
| Holdings | 77 | 86 |
| YTD Return | +4.89% | +11.07%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.43% | +9.66%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9%Best | 14.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.4%Best | -11.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $10,375 | $12,218Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.2% | 27.6%Best |
| Fund Family | GQG Partners LLC | Fundstrat Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2019 | Nov 7, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026 (1.3 years).
GQGU vs GRNY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
GQGU vs GRNY Performance
GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) is an ETF from GQG Partners LLC and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY) is an ETF from Fundstrat Capital. Over the past year GQGU returned +3.43% while GRNY returned +9.66%. Year to date, GQGU is up 4.89% versus a gain of 11.07% for GRNY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRNY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 11.9% for GQGU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.4% for GQGU and -11.6% for GRNY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GQGU charges 0.49% per year while GRNY charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $75 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GQGU currently yields 0.95% against 0.13% for GRNY.
Holdings Overlap
56.2% of GQGU's money is in holdings GRNY also owns. 36.0% of GRNY's money is in holdings GQGU also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in GQGU and 42 in GRNY, against full books of 77 and 86.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 27 positions for GRNY that do not appear in our book for GQGU (63.5% of the fund), and 21 for GQGU that do not appear in GRNY (40.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GQGU | Weight in GRNY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.37% | 2.47% | 6.90% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.16% | 2.50% | 5.66% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.83% | 2.43% | 5.40% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.76% | 2.18% | 4.58% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.08% | 2.62% | 1.46% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3.31% | 2.23% | 1.08% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 2.18% | 3.05% | 0.87% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 2.10% | 2.54% | 0.44% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 2.47% | 2.08% | 0.39% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.29% | 3.06% | 1.77% |
56.2% of GQGU is already inside GRNY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GQGU or GRNY?
GQGU has an expense ratio of 0.49% while GRNY charges 0.75%. GQGU is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GQGU or GRNY?
Over the past year GQGU returned +3.43% vs +9.66% for GRNY, so GRNY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GQGU annualized +2.87% vs +16.66% for GRNY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GQGU or GRNY?
GRNY has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 11.9% for GQGU. Worst drawdown: GQGU -8.4% vs GRNY -11.6%.
Should I hold both GQGU and GRNY?
GQGU and GRNY have a monthly-return correlation of -0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GQGU and GRNY?
56.2% of GQGU's money is in holdings GRNY also owns. 36.0% of GRNY's is in holdings GQGU also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in GQGU and 42 in GRNY.
Which pays a higher dividend, GQGU or GRNY?
GQGU yields 0.95% while GRNY yields 0.13%, so GQGU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GRNY better than GQGU?
GQGU has a lower expense ratio. GRNY led over 1Y and the full window. GRNY is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.