GQGU vs NQLT
GQG US Equity ETF vs Neuberger Quality Select ETF
Which is better, GQGU or NQLT?
NQLT costs less.
NQLT has a lower expense ratio. NQLT is less concentrated, with 51.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GQGU | NQLT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.48%Best |
| AUM | $584M | $50M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 77 | 63 |
| YTD Return | +4.89%Best | +3.05% |
| 1Y Return | +3.43% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.2% | 51.6%Best |
| Fund Family | GQG Partners LLC | Neuberger Berman |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2019 | Jul 10, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
GQGU vs NQLT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GQGU vs NQLT Performance
GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) is an ETF from GQG Partners LLC and Neuberger Quality Select ETF (NQLT) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman. Year to date, GQGU is up 4.89% versus a gain of 3.05% for NQLT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GQGU charges 0.49% per year while NQLT charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $48 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GQGU currently yields 0.95% against 0.00% for NQLT.
Holdings Overlap
45.8% of GQGU's money is in holdings NQLT also owns. 41.9% of NQLT's money is in holdings GQGU also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in GQGU and 63 in NQLT, against full books of 77 and 63.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 51 positions for NQLT that do not appear in our book for GQGU (54.6% of the fund), and 28 for GQGU that do not appear in NQLT (52.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GQGU | Weight in NQLT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.16% | 7.64% | 0.52% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.37% | 6.09% | 3.28% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.83% | 6.97% | 0.86% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.76% | 7.67% | 0.91% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 7.25% | 5.40% | 1.85% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.93% | 3.14% | 1.21% |
| ASL:ASAsml Holding Nv Unsponsored Adr Ordinary Shares | 1.22% | 3.02% | 1.80% |
| IBKRInteractive Brokers Group Inc | 1.86% | 1.54% | 0.32% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.44% | 0.43% | 1.01% |
45.8% of GQGU is already inside NQLT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GQGU or NQLT?
GQGU has an expense ratio of 0.49% while NQLT charges 0.48%. NQLT is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between GQGU and NQLT?
45.8% of GQGU's money is in holdings NQLT also owns. 41.9% of NQLT's is in holdings GQGU also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in GQGU and 63 in NQLT.
Which pays a higher dividend, GQGU or NQLT?
GQGU yields 0.95% while NQLT yields 0.00%, so GQGU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NQLT better than GQGU?
NQLT has a lower expense ratio. NQLT is less concentrated, with 51.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.