GRNY vs SXQG
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF vs ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF
Which is better, GRNY or SXQG?
GRNY has been ahead.
SXQG has a lower expense ratio. GRNY led over 1Y and the full window. GRNY is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRNY | SXQG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.70%Best |
| AUM | $4.5B | $63M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 86 | 235 |
| YTD Return | +10.83%Best | +3.37% |
| 1Y Return | +10.25%Best | +2.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.82% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.68% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 11.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.2% | -19.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $13,651Best | $10,475 |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.6%Best | 43.0% |
| Fund Family | Fundstrat Capital | 6 Meridian ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2024 | May 10, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
GRNY vs SXQG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
GRNY vs SXQG Performance
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY) is an ETF from Fundstrat Capital and ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) is an ETF from 6 Meridian ETF. Over the past year GRNY returned +10.25% while SXQG returned +2.54%. Year to date, GRNY is up 10.83% versus a gain of 3.37% for SXQG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRNY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 11.7% for SXQG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.2% for GRNY and -19.5% for SXQG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRNY charges 0.75% per year while SXQG charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $70 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRNY currently yields 0.13% against 0.00% for SXQG.
Holdings Overlap
28.7% of GRNY's money is in holdings SXQG also owns. 42.1% of SXQG's money is in holdings GRNY also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in GRNY and 84 in SXQG, against full books of 86 and 235.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 68 positions for SXQG that do not appear in our book for GRNY (55.5% of the fund), and 30 for GRNY that do not appear in SXQG (70.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GRNY | Weight in SXQG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.50% | 4.94% | 2.44% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.43% | 4.97% | 2.54% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.47% | 4.74% | 2.27% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.30% | 4.80% | 2.50% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.62% | 4.29% | 1.67% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 2.54% | 4.17% | 1.63% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.20% | 3.93% | 1.73% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 2.19% | 3.75% | 1.56% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 2.58% | 2.57% | 0.01% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 2.20% | 1.87% | 0.33% |
42.1% of SXQG is already inside GRNY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRNY or SXQG?
GRNY has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SXQG charges 0.70%. SXQG is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GRNY or SXQG?
Over the past year GRNY returned +10.25% vs +2.54% for SXQG, so GRNY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GRNY annualized +17.80% vs +2.47% for SXQG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GRNY or SXQG?
GRNY has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 11.7% for SXQG. Worst drawdown: GRNY -24.2% vs SXQG -19.5%.
Should I hold both GRNY and SXQG?
GRNY and SXQG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GRNY and SXQG?
42.1% of SXQG's money is in holdings GRNY also owns. 42.1% of SXQG's is in holdings GRNY also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in GRNY and 84 in SXQG.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRNY or SXQG?
GRNY yields 0.13% while SXQG yields 0.00%, so GRNY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SXQG better than GRNY?
SXQG has a lower expense ratio. GRNY led over 1Y and the full window. GRNY is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.