GSGO vs SAWG
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF
Which is better, GSGO or SAWG?
SAWG has been ahead.
GSGO has a lower expense ratio. SAWG led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSGO | SAWG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $192M | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 54 | 45 |
| YTD Return | +11.23% | +12.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.69% | +14.60%Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 24, 1999 | Jul 30, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GSGO vs SAWG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GSGO vs SAWG Performance
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) is an ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year GSGO returned +12.69% while SAWG returned +14.60%. Year to date, GSGO is up 11.23% versus a gain of 12.82% for SAWG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSGO charges 0.45% per year while SAWG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $49 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSGO currently yields 0.00% against 0.25% for SAWG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 53 holdings in GSGO and 1 in SAWG, totalling 100.0% and 0.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in GSGO and 1 in SAWG, against full books of 54 and 45.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GSGO and SAWG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSGO or SAWG?
GSGO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while SAWG charges 0.49%. GSGO is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GSGO or SAWG?
Over the past year GSGO returned +12.69% vs +14.60% for SAWG, so SAWG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSGO or SAWG?
GSGO yields 0.00% while SAWG yields 0.25%, so SAWG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SAWG better than GSGO?
GSGO has a lower expense ratio. SAWG led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.