GSKH vs VTI

GSKH vs VTI

Which is better, GSKH or VTI?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. GSKH led over the full window, VTI over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGSKHVTI
Expense Ratio0.19%0.03%Best
AUM$668,891$689.2B
Dividend Yield3.04%1.06%
Holdings53,524
YTD Return+0.71%+13.02%Best
1Y Return+12.33%+16.63%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Volatility (annualized)20.7%12.7%Best
Max Drawdown-21.1%-19.3%Best
$10,000 over 1.8 years$14,068Best$13,274
Fund FamilyADRHVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 15, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 7, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).

GSKH vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.

GSKH vs VTI Performance

GSK plc ADRhedged (GSKH) is an ETF from ADRH and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GSKH returned +12.33% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, GSKH is up 0.71% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GSKH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 12.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.1% for GSKH and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.19. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GSKH charges 0.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSKH currently yields 3.04% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in GSKH and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 96.4% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in GSKH and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 5 and 3,524.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GSKH and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GSKHVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GSKH or VTI?

GSKH has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GSKH or VTI?

Over the past year GSKH returned +12.33% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GSKH annualized +20.88% vs +17.04% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GSKH or VTI?

GSKH has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 12.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GSKH -21.1% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both GSKH and VTI?

GSKH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.19, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GSKH or VTI?

GSKH yields 3.04% while VTI yields 1.06%, so GSKH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than GSKH?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. GSKH led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.