GTEK vs NFRA
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF vs Northern Trust STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure ETF
Which is better, GTEK or NFRA?
GTEK has been ahead.
NFRA has a lower expense ratio. GTEK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. NFRA is less concentrated, with 19.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTEK | NFRA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.47%Best |
| AUM | $244M | $3.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 5.92% |
| Holdings | 122 | 216 |
| YTD Return | +38.51%Best | +4.94% |
| 1Y Return | +43.93%Best | +5.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +33.08%Best | +13.31% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.36%Best | +5.50% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.1% | 14.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.8% | -22.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,263Best | $13,070 |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.4% | 19.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Northern Trust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2021 | Oct 8, 2013 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.1 years).
GTEK vs NFRA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
GTEK vs NFRA Performance
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Northern Trust STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure ETF (NFRA) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management. Over the past year GTEK returned +43.93% while NFRA returned +5.61%. Year to date, GTEK is up 38.51% versus a gain of 4.94% for NFRA.
Over three years, GTEK compounded at +33.08% per year against +13.31% for NFRA; over five years the annualized figures are +7.36% and +5.50% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GTEK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.1% compared with 14.0% for NFRA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.8% for GTEK and -22.1% for NFRA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTEK charges 0.75% per year while NFRA charges 0.47%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $47 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTEK currently yields 0.00% against 5.92% for NFRA.
Holdings Overlap
1.0% of GTEK's money is in holdings NFRA also owns. 1.7% of NFRA's money is in holdings GTEK also owns.
NFRA and GTEK share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in GTEK and 72 in NFRA, against full books of 122 and 216.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 20 positions for NFRA that do not appear in our book for GTEK (28.8% of the fund), and 27 for GTEK that do not appear in NFRA (44.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GTEK | Weight in NFRA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc | 1.01% | 1.66% | 0.65% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GTEK and NFRA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTEK or NFRA?
GTEK has an expense ratio of 0.75% while NFRA charges 0.47%. NFRA is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GTEK or NFRA?
Over the past year GTEK returned +43.93% vs +5.61% for NFRA, so GTEK leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GTEK or NFRA?
GTEK has been the more volatile fund at 27.1% annualized versus 14.0% for NFRA. Worst drawdown: GTEK -53.8% vs NFRA -22.1%.
Should I hold both GTEK and NFRA?
GTEK and NFRA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GTEK and NFRA?
1.7% of NFRA's money is in holdings GTEK also owns. 1.7% of NFRA's is in holdings GTEK also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in GTEK and 72 in NFRA.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTEK or NFRA?
GTEK yields 0.00% while NFRA yields 5.92%, so NFRA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NFRA better than GTEK?
NFRA has a lower expense ratio. GTEK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. NFRA is less concentrated, with 19.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.