GTOH vs RSF
Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF vs RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund, Inc.
Which is better, GTOH or RSF?
RSF has been ahead.
GTOH has a lower expense ratio. RSF led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOH | RSF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48%Best | 5.25% |
| AUM | $13M | $49M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.78% | 11.07% |
| Holdings | 397 | 9,552 |
| YTD Return | -3.90% | +7.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +7.51% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +3.77% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | RiverNorth |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2022 | Sep 22, 2016 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GTOH vs RSF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GTOH vs RSF Performance
Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund, Inc. (RSF) is an ETF from RiverNorth. Year to date, GTOH is down 3.90% versus a gain of 7.43% for RSF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTOH charges 0.48% per year while RSF charges 5.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $525 annually, a gap of $477 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTOH currently yields 5.78% against 11.07% for RSF.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 131 holdings in GTOH and 15 in RSF, totalling 73.7% and 5.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 77 days apart, GTOH as of Sep 15, 2026 and RSF as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in GTOH and 15 in RSF, against full books of 397 and 9,552.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GTOH and RSF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTOH or RSF?
GTOH has an expense ratio of 0.48% while RSF charges 5.25%. GTOH is the cheaper option, by $477 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTOH or RSF?
GTOH yields 5.78% while RSF yields 11.07%, so RSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSF better than GTOH?
GTOH has a lower expense ratio. RSF led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.