GTOH vs SMTH
Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF vs ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
Which is better, GTOH or SMTH?
GTOH has been ahead.
GTOH has a lower expense ratio. GTOH led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOH | SMTH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $13M | $3.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.78% | 4.48% |
| Holdings | 397 | 921 |
| YTD Return | -4.05% | -2.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | -2.47% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | ALPS Advisors |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2022 | Dec 5, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GTOH vs SMTH growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GTOH vs SMTH Performance
Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors. Year to date, GTOH is down 4.05% versus a loss of 2.50% for SMTH.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTOH charges 0.48% per year while SMTH charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $59 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTOH currently yields 5.78% against 4.48% for SMTH.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 131 holdings in GTOH and 147 in SMTH, totalling 73.7% and 30.2% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 2 positions appear in both.
2 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in GTOH and 147 in SMTH, against full books of 397 and 921.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GTOH | Weight in SMTH | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RKT 6.125 08/01/30 1Rocket Companies Inc 6.125% | 0.87% | 0.04% | 0.83% |
| CE 6.83 07/15/29Celanese Us Holdings Llc Corp. Note | 0.48% | 0.03% | 0.45% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GTOH and SMTH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTOH or SMTH?
GTOH has an expense ratio of 0.48% while SMTH charges 0.59%. GTOH is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTOH or SMTH?
GTOH yields 5.78% while SMTH yields 4.48%, so GTOH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMTH better than GTOH?
GTOH has a lower expense ratio. GTOH led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.