GTOH vs WTBN
Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF vs WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund ETF
Which is better, GTOH or WTBN?
GTOH has been ahead.
GTOH has a lower expense ratio. GTOH led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOH | WTBN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $13M | $103M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.78% | 4.22% |
| Holdings | 397 | 14 |
| YTD Return | -4.05% | -3.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | -3.25% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2022 | Dec 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GTOH vs WTBN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GTOH vs WTBN Performance
Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund ETF (WTBN) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Year to date, GTOH is down 4.05% versus a loss of 3.29% for WTBN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTOH charges 0.48% per year while WTBN charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $60 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTOH currently yields 5.78% against 4.22% for WTBN.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 131 holdings in GTOH and 14 in WTBN, totalling 73.7% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in GTOH and 14 in WTBN, against full books of 397 and 14.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 131 and 14 positions we hold weights for.
GTOH holds 131 positions WTBN does not, 73.7% of the fund.
Largest: IUGXX 2.35%, CNC 2.5 03/01/31 1.49%, BBWI 6.625 10/01/30 1.49%, VIKCRU 5 02/15/28 14 1.48%, NSCO 5.5 04/15/29 14 1.47%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GTOH and WTBN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTOH or WTBN?
GTOH has an expense ratio of 0.48% while WTBN charges 0.60%. GTOH is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTOH or WTBN?
GTOH yields 5.78% while WTBN yields 4.22%, so GTOH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WTBN better than GTOH?
GTOH has a lower expense ratio. GTOH led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.