GVUS vs VTI
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GVUS or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GVUS led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. GVUS is less concentrated, with 28.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GVUS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $438M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.46% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 1,716 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +21.38%Best | +14.35% |
| 1Y Return | +28.21%Best | +17.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.47% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.62% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.3%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $17,054 | $17,615Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.9%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 28, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 30, 2023 to Oct 13, 2026 (2.9 years).
GVUS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
GVUS vs VTI Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GVUS returned +28.21% while VTI returned +17.97%. Year to date, GVUS is up 21.38% versus a gain of 14.35% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 11.7% for GVUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.3% for GVUS and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GVUS charges 0.12% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GVUS currently yields 1.46% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.8% of GVUS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 62.5% of VTI's money is in holdings GVUS also owns.
Most of GVUS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, GVUS as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
826 positions in common, counted across the 857 positions we hold weights for in GVUS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 1,716 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 396 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GVUS (35.4% of the fund), and 12 for GVUS that do not appear in VTI (0.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GVUS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.80% | 6.29% | 0.49% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.92% | 4.79% | 0.13% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.01% | 3.65% | 2.36% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.53% | 1.31% | 1.22% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 2.53% | 1.28% | 1.25% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.85% | 0.89% | 0.96% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.73% | 0.86% | 0.87% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.69% | 1.70% | 1.01% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.13% | 0.68% | 0.45% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.23% | 0.50% | 0.73% |
98.8% of GVUS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GVUS or VTI?
GVUS has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GVUS or VTI?
Over the past year GVUS returned +28.21% vs +17.97% for VTI, so GVUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GVUS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 11.7% for GVUS. Worst drawdown: GVUS -16.3% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both GVUS and VTI?
GVUS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GVUS and VTI?
98.8% of GVUS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 62.5% of VTI's is in holdings GVUS also owns. They hold 826 positions in common, counted across the 857 positions we hold weights for in GVUS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GVUS or VTI?
GVUS yields 1.46% while VTI yields 1.03%, so GVUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GVUS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GVUS led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. GVUS is less concentrated, with 28.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.