GXPS vs VYM
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GXPS or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $68M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.30% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 33 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +14.57%Best | +11.83% |
| 1Y Return | +13.20% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 10.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.2% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $11,214 | $11,948Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 81.6% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.2 years).
GXPS vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
GXPS vs VYM Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPS returned +13.20% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, GXPS is up 14.57% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 10.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.2% for GXPS and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPS charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPS currently yields 1.30% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
63.9% of GXPS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 7.5% of VYM's money is in holdings GXPS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
22 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in GXPS and 602 in VYM, against full books of 33 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 551 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GXPS (90.3% of the fund), and 7 for GXPS that do not appear in VYM (34.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GXPS | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 11.79% | 1.39% | 10.40% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 11.67% | 1.36% | 10.31% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 10.27% | 1.18% | 9.09% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 6.42% | 0.77% | 5.65% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 3.97% | 0.46% | 3.51% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 2.75% | 0.32% | 2.43% |
| TGTTARGET CORP | 2.42% | 0.29% | 2.13% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 2.27% | 0.29% | 1.98% |
| KDPKeurig Dr Pepper Inc (kdp Us) | 1.47% | 0.17% | 1.30% |
| SYYSysco Corp | 1.36% | 0.16% | 1.20% |
63.9% of GXPS is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPS or VYM?
GXPS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GXPS or VYM?
Over the past year GXPS returned +13.20% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPS annualized +10.02% vs +15.99% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GXPS or VYM?
GXPS has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 10.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GXPS -9.2% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both GXPS and VYM?
GXPS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPS and VYM?
63.9% of GXPS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 7.5% of VYM's is in holdings GXPS also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in GXPS and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPS or VYM?
GXPS yields 1.30% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GXPS?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.