GXPT vs VTI
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GXPT or VTI?
GXPT has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GXPT led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $148M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.20% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 172 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +26.34%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +28.76%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.6% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.7% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $13,878Best | $12,182 |
| Top 10 Weight | 73.9% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.2 years).
GXPT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
GXPT vs VTI Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPT returned +28.76% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, GXPT is up 26.34% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 11.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.7% for GXPT and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPT charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPT currently yields 0.20% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.9% of GXPT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 33.7% of VTI's money is in holdings GXPT also owns.
Most of GXPT is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
79 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in GXPT and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 172 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,077 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GXPT (63.9% of the fund), and 1 for GXPT that do not appear in VTI (0.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GXPT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 20.26% | 6.88% | 13.38% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 18.46% | 6.30% | 12.16% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 13.75% | 5.11% | 8.64% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 6.04% | 2.38% | 3.66% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.57% | 1.46% | 3.11% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.90% | 1.04% | 2.86% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.98% | 0.51% | 1.47% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.67% | 0.53% | 1.14% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.64% | 0.51% | 1.13% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.61% | 0.49% | 1.12% |
98.9% of GXPT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPT or VTI?
GXPT has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GXPT or VTI?
Over the past year GXPT returned +28.76% vs +16.63% for VTI, so GXPT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPT annualized +31.40% vs +17.88% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GXPT or VTI?
GXPT has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 11.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GXPT -18.7% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both GXPT and VTI?
GXPT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPT and VTI?
98.9% of GXPT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 33.7% of VTI's is in holdings GXPT also owns. They hold 79 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in GXPT and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPT or VTI?
GXPT yields 0.20% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GXPT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GXPT led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.