HAP vs KOCG
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs FIS Knights of Columbus Global Belief ETF
Which is better, HAP or KOCG?
Each has led over a different period.
HAP has a lower expense ratio. HAP led over 1Y, KOCG over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HAP | KOCG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41%Best | 0.76% |
| AUM | $335M | $29M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.87% | 0.88% |
| Holdings | 131 | 82 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 16.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.7%Best | -28.7% |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $12,572 | $13,079Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Faith Investor Services |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 29, 2008 | Jul 13, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 453 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. HAP has data through Oct 14, 2026 and KOCG through Jul 18, 2025.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2021 to Jul 18, 2025 (4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 16.1% for KOCG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.7% for HAP and -28.7% for KOCG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HAP charges 0.41% per year while KOCG charges 0.76%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $76 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAP currently yields 1.87% against 0.88% for KOCG.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HAP and KOCG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HAP or KOCG?
HAP has an expense ratio of 0.41% while KOCG charges 0.76%. HAP is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, HAP or KOCG?
HAP has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 16.1% for KOCG. Worst drawdown: HAP -25.7% vs KOCG -28.7%.
Should I hold both HAP and KOCG?
HAP and KOCG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, HAP or KOCG?
HAP yields 1.87% while KOCG yields 0.88%, so HAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KOCG better than HAP?
HAP has a lower expense ratio. HAP led over 1Y, KOCG over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.