HAWG vs VTI
HCM Hedged Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, HAWG or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HAWG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $101M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 489 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +0.62% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.6% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Howard Capital Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 13, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
HAWG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HAWG vs VTI Performance
HCM Hedged Equity ETF (HAWG) is an ETF from Howard Capital Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, HAWG is up 0.62% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HAWG charges 1.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $3 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAWG currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.8% of HAWG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 88.5% of VTI's money is in holdings HAWG also owns.
Most of HAWG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
468 positions in common, counted across the 489 positions we hold weights for in HAWG and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 489 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 694 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for HAWG (9.3% of the fund), and 12 for HAWG that do not appear in VTI (0.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HAWG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.83% | 6.88% | 3.95% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.94% | 6.30% | 3.64% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.68% | 5.11% | 2.57% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.16% | 3.41% | 1.75% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.14% | 2.70% | 1.44% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.57% | 2.38% | 1.19% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.58% | 2.12% | 1.46% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.02% | 1.70% | 1.32% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.35% | 1.46% | 0.89% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.36% | 1.40% | 0.96% |
96.8% of HAWG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HAWG or VTI?
HAWG has an expense ratio of 1.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $132 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between HAWG and VTI?
96.8% of HAWG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 88.5% of VTI's is in holdings HAWG also owns. They hold 468 positions in common, counted across the 489 positions we hold weights for in HAWG and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, HAWG or VTI?
HAWG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than HAWG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.