HEDG vs SEPM
Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF vs FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - September
Which is better, HEDG or SEPM?
HEDG has been ahead.
SEPM has a lower expense ratio. HEDG led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HEDG | SEPM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.85%Best |
| AUM | $465M | $37M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.78% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +6.78%Best | +5.12% |
| 1Y Return | +10.34%Best | +6.53% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.6% | 2.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -3.9% | -1.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,015Best | $10,640 |
| Fund Family | Equable Shares | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2025 | Sep 20, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 13, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
HEDG vs SEPM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
HEDG vs SEPM Performance
Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF (HEDG) is an ETF from Equable Shares and FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - September (SEPM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year HEDG returned +10.34% while SEPM returned +6.53%. Year to date, HEDG is up 6.78% versus a gain of 5.12% for SEPM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HEDG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3.6% compared with 2.7% for SEPM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.9% for HEDG and -1.8% for SEPM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HEDG charges 0.96% per year while SEPM charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $85 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HEDG currently yields 2.78% against 0.00% for SEPM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HEDG and SEPM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HEDG or SEPM?
HEDG has an expense ratio of 0.96% while SEPM charges 0.85%. SEPM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HEDG or SEPM?
Over the past year HEDG returned +10.34% vs +6.53% for SEPM, so HEDG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HEDG annualized +10.15% vs +6.40% for SEPM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HEDG or SEPM?
HEDG has been the more volatile fund at 3.6% annualized versus 2.7% for SEPM. Worst drawdown: HEDG -3.9% vs SEPM -1.8%.
Should I hold both HEDG and SEPM?
HEDG and SEPM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, HEDG or SEPM?
HEDG yields 2.78% while SEPM yields 0.00%, so HEDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SEPM better than HEDG?
SEPM has a lower expense ratio. HEDG led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.