HEDG vs XBFR
Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF vs Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF
Which is better, HEDG or XBFR?
XBFR costs less.
XBFR has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HEDG | XBFR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $465M | $52M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.78% | 0.10% |
| Holdings | 10 | 400 |
| YTD Return | +6.78% | +7.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.34% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | Equable Shares | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2025 | Feb 24, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
HEDG vs XBFR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HEDG vs XBFR Performance
Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF (HEDG) is an ETF from Equable Shares and Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Year to date, HEDG is up 6.78% versus a gain of 7.92% for XBFR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HEDG charges 0.96% per year while XBFR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $79 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HEDG currently yields 2.78% against 0.10% for XBFR.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 10 holdings in HEDG and 182 in XBFR, totalling 104.3% and 97.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in HEDG and 182 in XBFR, against full books of 10 and 400.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 10 and 182 positions we hold weights for.
XBFR holds 174 positions HEDG does not, 95.9% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.27%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 3.71%, GOOGL 3.04%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HEDG and XBFR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HEDG or XBFR?
HEDG has an expense ratio of 0.96% while XBFR charges 0.79%. XBFR is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, HEDG or XBFR?
HEDG yields 2.78% while XBFR yields 0.10%, so HEDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XBFR better than HEDG?
XBFR has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.