HELO vs HRSK
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF vs Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF
Which is better, HELO or HRSK?
HELO costs less.
HELO has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HELO | HRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $4.9B | $35M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 156 | 121 |
| YTD Return | +5.28%Best | +0.16% |
| 1Y Return | +8.07% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.00% | - |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | TOEWS Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2023 | Jun 15, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
HELO vs HRSK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HELO vs HRSK Performance
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF (HRSK) is an ETF from TOEWS Funds. Year to date, HELO is up 5.28% versus a gain of 0.16% for HRSK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HELO charges 0.50% per year while HRSK charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $95 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HELO currently yields 0.57% against 0.00% for HRSK.
Holdings Overlap
At least 63.3% of HELO's money is in holdings HRSK also owns.
Stated as a floor: for HRSK, our book for it covers 58.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
55 positions in common, counted across the 146 positions we hold weights for in HELO and 117 in HRSK, against full books of 156 and 121.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HELO | Weight in HRSK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.01% | 3.03% | 3.98% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.17% | 1.31% | 6.86% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.29% | 2.50% | 3.79% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.64% | 3.48% | 0.84% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.26% | 0.96% | 3.30% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.16% | 0.73% | 2.43% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.31% | 0.64% | 1.67% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.26% | 0.30% | 1.96% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.70% | 0.03% | 1.67% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.74% | 0.94% | 0.20% |
63.3% of HELO is already inside HRSK.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HELO or HRSK?
HELO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while HRSK charges 0.95%. HELO is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between HELO and HRSK?
At least 63.3% of HELO's money is in holdings HRSK also owns. Our book for HRSK is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 55 positions in common, counted across the 146 positions we hold weights for in HELO and 117 in HRSK.
Which pays a higher dividend, HELO or HRSK?
HELO yields 0.57% while HRSK yields 0.00%, so HELO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HRSK better than HELO?
HELO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.