HELO vs JPEF
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF vs JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF
Which is better, HELO or JPEF?
Nearly the same fund. JPEF costs less.
JPEF has a lower expense ratio. JPEF led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. HELO is less concentrated, with 40.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HELO | JPEF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $4.9B | $2.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 0.64% |
| Holdings | 156 | 84 |
| YTD Return | +4.91% | +9.64%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.68% | +11.56%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.88% | +19.60%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.3%Best | 12.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.9%Best | -18.1% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $14,128 | $17,397Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.1%Best | 45.8% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2023 | Mar 10, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 29, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
HELO vs JPEF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
HELO vs JPEF Performance
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF (JPEF) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year HELO returned +7.68% while JPEF returned +11.56%. Year to date, HELO is up 4.91% versus a gain of 9.64% for JPEF.
Over three years, HELO compounded at +11.88% per year against +19.60% for JPEF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JPEF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.1% compared with 7.3% for HELO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.9% for HELO and -18.1% for JPEF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HELO charges 0.50% per year while JPEF charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $44 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HELO currently yields 0.57% against 0.64% for JPEF.
Holdings Overlap
50.6% of HELO's money is in holdings JPEF also owns. 80.5% of JPEF's money is in holdings HELO also owns.
Most of JPEF is already inside HELO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
30 positions in common, counted across the 146 positions we hold weights for in HELO and 41 in JPEF, against full books of 156 and 84.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for JPEF that do not appear in our book for HELO (17.7% of the fund), and 113 for HELO that do not appear in JPEF (47.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HELO | Weight in JPEF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 8.17% | 9.59% | 1.42% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 7.01% | 5.69% | 1.32% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp_None_0 | 6.29% | 5.05% | 1.24% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.26% | 4.50% | 0.24% |
| GOOGAlphabet, Inc.- Cl C | 2.26% | 6.33% | 4.07% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.64% | 2.80% | 0.16% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2.31% | 2.36% | 0.05% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.40% | 3.24% | 1.84% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.70% | 2.45% | 0.75% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.28% | 2.74% | 1.46% |
80.5% of JPEF is already inside HELO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HELO or JPEF?
HELO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while JPEF charges 0.44%. JPEF is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HELO or JPEF?
Over the past year HELO returned +7.68% vs +11.56% for JPEF, so JPEF leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HELO or JPEF?
JPEF has been the more volatile fund at 12.1% annualized versus 7.3% for HELO. Worst drawdown: HELO -10.9% vs JPEF -18.1%.
Should I hold both HELO and JPEF?
HELO and JPEF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HELO and JPEF?
80.5% of JPEF's money is in holdings HELO also owns. 80.5% of JPEF's is in holdings HELO also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 146 positions we hold weights for in HELO and 41 in JPEF.
Which pays a higher dividend, HELO or JPEF?
HELO yields 0.57% while JPEF yields 0.64%, so JPEF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JPEF better than HELO?
JPEF has a lower expense ratio. JPEF led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. HELO is less concentrated, with 40.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.