HELO vs WLTG
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF vs WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
Which is better, HELO or WLTG?
WLTG has been ahead.
HELO has a lower expense ratio. WLTG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. HELO is less concentrated, with 40.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HELO | WLTG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.74% |
| AUM | $4.9B | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 4.08% |
| Holdings | 156 | 87 |
| YTD Return | +4.91% | +7.96%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.68% | +13.35%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.88% | +22.48%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.3%Best | 12.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.9%Best | -17.1% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $14,128 | $18,668Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.1%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | WealthTrust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2023 | Dec 6, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 29, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
HELO vs WLTG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
HELO vs WLTG Performance
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) is an ETF from WealthTrust Asset Management. Over the past year HELO returned +7.68% while WLTG returned +13.35%. Year to date, HELO is up 4.91% versus a gain of 7.96% for WLTG.
Over three years, HELO compounded at +11.88% per year against +22.48% for WLTG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WLTG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 7.3% for HELO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.9% for HELO and -17.1% for WLTG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HELO charges 0.50% per year while WLTG charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $74 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HELO currently yields 0.57% against 4.08% for WLTG.
Holdings Overlap
40.7% of HELO's money is in holdings WLTG also owns. 39.8% of WLTG's money is in holdings HELO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 146 positions we hold weights for in HELO and 41 in WLTG, against full books of 156 and 87.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 22 positions for WLTG that do not appear in our book for HELO (54.6% of the fund), and 126 for HELO that do not appear in WLTG (57.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HELO | Weight in WLTG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.17% | 4.25% | 3.92% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.01% | 1.67% | 5.34% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.29% | 2.05% | 4.24% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.26% | 2.93% | 1.33% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.31% | 3.87% | 1.56% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.16% | 2.39% | 0.77% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.14% | 3.53% | 2.39% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.64% | 1.91% | 0.73% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.70% | 2.78% | 1.08% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp. | 0.24% | 2.64% | 2.40% |
40.7% of HELO is already inside WLTG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HELO or WLTG?
HELO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while WLTG charges 0.74%. HELO is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HELO or WLTG?
Over the past year HELO returned +7.68% vs +13.35% for WLTG, so WLTG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HELO or WLTG?
WLTG has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 7.3% for HELO. Worst drawdown: HELO -10.9% vs WLTG -17.1%.
Should I hold both HELO and WLTG?
HELO and WLTG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HELO and WLTG?
40.7% of HELO's money is in holdings WLTG also owns. 39.8% of WLTG's is in holdings HELO also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 146 positions we hold weights for in HELO and 41 in WLTG.
Which pays a higher dividend, HELO or WLTG?
HELO yields 0.57% while WLTG yields 4.08%, so WLTG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WLTG better than HELO?
HELO has a lower expense ratio. WLTG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. HELO is less concentrated, with 40.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.