HELS vs IVV

HELS vs IVV

Which is better, HELS or IVV?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.8%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHELSIVV
Expense Ratio0.70%0.03%Best
AUM$17M$896.5B
Dividend Yield0.02%1.10%
Holdings51508
YTD Return-3.87%+13.59%Best
1Y Return-+17.54%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.28%
Top 10 Weight39.8%38.9%Best
Fund FamilyHedgeye Asset ManagementiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 10, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

HELS vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

HELS vs IVV Performance

Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF (HELS) is an ETF from Hedgeye Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, HELS is down 3.87% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HELS charges 0.70% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HELS currently yields 0.02% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

HELS already in IVV52.2%
IVV already in HELS37.2%

52.2% of HELS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 37.2% of IVV's money is in holdings HELS also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

38 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in HELS and 506 in IVV, against full books of 51 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 462 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for HELS (62.2% of the fund), and 24 for HELS that do not appear in IVV (49.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HELSWeight in IVVDifference
AAPLApple, Inc4.63%7.29%2.66%
NVDANvidia Corp2.99%8.44%5.45%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.67%5.76%2.09%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.99%3.68%1.69%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.95%2.42%0.53%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.93%1.39%1.54%
XOMExxonmobil Corp.3.04%1.02%2.02%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.3.11%0.44%2.67%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc2.22%0.66%1.56%
INTCIntel Corporation1.82%0.90%0.92%

52.2% of HELS is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

HELSIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HELS or IVV?

HELS has an expense ratio of 0.70% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between HELS and IVV?

52.2% of HELS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 37.2% of IVV's is in holdings HELS also owns. They hold 38 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in HELS and 506 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, HELS or IVV?

HELS yields 0.02% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than HELS?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.