HFEV vs HFUL

HFEV vs HFUL

Which is better, HFEV or HFUL?

HFUL costs less.

HFUL has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: HFUL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHFEVHFUL
Expense Ratio0.65%0.60%Best
Fund FamilyNew Age AlphaNew Age Alpha
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthMid Cap Growth
InceptionNov 22, 2019Nov 22, 2019

Not shown on this pair: AUM, Dividend Yield, Holdings, YTD Price Return, 1Y Price Return, 3Y Price Return (annualized), 5Y Price Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for HFEV or HFUL. We have no price series for HFEV, so there is nothing to compare it against.

Compare HFEV against instead:HFEV vs SPYHFEV vs QQQHFEV vs VOOHFEV vs VTIHFUL against:HFUL vs VXUS

Fees and Cost Over Time

HFEV charges 0.65% per year while HFUL charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $60 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of HFEV and HFUL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

HFEVHFUL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HFEV or HFUL?

HFEV has an expense ratio of 0.65% while HFUL charges 0.60%. HFUL is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Is HFUL better than HFEV?

HFUL has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.