HFGO vs TCHP
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Which is better, HFGO or TCHP?
Nearly the same fund. TCHP costs less.
TCHP has a lower expense ratio. HFGO led over 1Y and 3Y, TCHP over 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. TCHP is less concentrated, with 59.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HFGO | TCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.57%Best |
| AUM | $186M | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 48 | 65 |
| YTD Return | +8.71%Best | +2.74% |
| 1Y Return | +10.28%Best | +5.10% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.71%Best | +21.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.72% | +9.18%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 20.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.6% | -42.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,190 | $15,514Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.2% | 59.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | Aug 4, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 10, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.9 years).
HFGO vs TCHP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.
HFGO vs TCHP Performance
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year HFGO returned +10.28% while TCHP returned +5.10%. Year to date, HFGO is up 8.71% versus a gain of 2.74% for TCHP.
Over three years, HFGO compounded at +25.71% per year against +21.81% for TCHP; over five years the annualized figures are +8.72% and +9.18% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HFGO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 20.5% for TCHP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.6% for HFGO and -42.3% for TCHP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HFGO charges 0.59% per year while TCHP charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $57 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HFGO currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for TCHP.
Holdings Overlap
66.8% of HFGO's money is in holdings TCHP also owns. 66.2% of TCHP's money is in holdings HFGO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in HFGO and 62 in TCHP, against full books of 48 and 65.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 42 positions for TCHP that do not appear in our book for HFGO (32.1% of the fund), and 24 for HFGO that do not appear in TCHP (28.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HFGO | Weight in TCHP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 16.55% | 17.43% | 0.88% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 9.88% | 5.50% | 4.38% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.33% | 5.92% | 0.59% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.41% | 5.79% | 0.38% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.81% | 4.94% | 0.13% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.50% | 3.60% | 0.90% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.54% | 3.53% | 1.01% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 1.01% | 5.94% | 4.93% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.82% | 3.05% | 0.77% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.94% | 2.92% | 1.98% |
66.8% of HFGO is already inside TCHP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HFGO or TCHP?
HFGO has an expense ratio of 0.59% while TCHP charges 0.57%. TCHP is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HFGO or TCHP?
Over the past year HFGO returned +10.28% vs +5.10% for TCHP, so HFGO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HFGO or TCHP?
HFGO has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 20.5% for TCHP. Worst drawdown: HFGO -44.6% vs TCHP -42.3%.
Should I hold both HFGO and TCHP?
HFGO and TCHP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HFGO and TCHP?
66.8% of HFGO's money is in holdings TCHP also owns. 66.2% of TCHP's is in holdings HFGO also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in HFGO and 62 in TCHP.
Which pays a higher dividend, HFGO or TCHP?
HFGO yields 0.00% while TCHP yields 0.00%, so TCHP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TCHP better than HFGO?
TCHP has a lower expense ratio. HFGO led over 1Y and 3Y, TCHP over 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. TCHP is less concentrated, with 59.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.