HFND vs TBFG
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF vs The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
Which is better, HFND or TBFG?
TBFG has been ahead.
TBFG has a lower expense ratio. TBFG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HFND | TBFG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.46%Best |
| AUM | $38M | $386M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.80% | 2.45% |
| Holdings | 47 | 24 |
| YTD Return | +4.88% | +8.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.34% | +12.49%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.04% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.1%Best | 9.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.3%Best | -14.2% |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $12,452 | $13,586Best |
| Fund Family | Unlimited Funds | Brinsmere Fund |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Allocation/Balanced |
| Inception | Oct 10, 2022 | Jan 12, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 16, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.7 years).
HFND vs TBFG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
HFND vs TBFG Performance
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) is an ETF from Unlimited Funds and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) is an ETF from Brinsmere Fund. Over the past year HFND returned +5.34% while TBFG returned +12.49%. Year to date, HFND is up 4.88% versus a gain of 8.65% for TBFG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TBFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.1% compared with 7.1% for HFND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for HFND and -14.2% for TBFG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HFND charges 1.07% per year while TBFG charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $46 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HFND currently yields 4.80% against 2.45% for TBFG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 3.0% of TBFG's money is in holdings HFND also owns.
Stated as a floor: for HFND, our book for it covers 93.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
TBFG and HFND share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in HFND and 23 in TBFG, against full books of 47 and 24.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 23 and 23 positions we hold weights for.
HFND holds 22 positions TBFG does not, 86.9% of the fund.
Largest: FGXXX 46.17%, EMHY 5.47%, VO 4.61%, AGZ 4.24%, VUG 3.63%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HFND | Weight in TBFG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VTVVanguard Value ETF | 6.35% | 3.00% | 3.35% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HFND and TBFG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HFND or TBFG?
HFND has an expense ratio of 1.07% while TBFG charges 0.46%. TBFG is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HFND or TBFG?
Over the past year HFND returned +5.34% vs +12.49% for TBFG, so TBFG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HFND or TBFG?
TBFG has been the more volatile fund at 9.1% annualized versus 7.1% for HFND. Worst drawdown: HFND -13.3% vs TBFG -14.2%.
Should I hold both HFND and TBFG?
HFND and TBFG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HFND and TBFG?
At least 3.0% of TBFG's money is in holdings HFND also owns. Our book for HFND is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in HFND and 23 in TBFG.
Which pays a higher dividend, HFND or TBFG?
HFND yields 4.80% while TBFG yields 2.45%, so HFND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TBFG better than HFND?
TBFG has a lower expense ratio. TBFG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.