HFUL vs VTI

HFUL vs VTI

Which is better, HFUL or VTI?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHFULVTI
Expense Ratio0.60%0.03%Best
AUM-$689.2B
Dividend Yield-1.06%
Holdings-3,524
YTD Price Return-+12.06%
1Y Price Return-+15.31%
3Y Price Return (annualized)-+20.42%
5Y Price Return (annualized)-+10.44%
Volatility (annualized)-15.3%
Max Drawdown--56.6%
Fund FamilyNew Age AlphaVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 22, 2019May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for HFUL. We have no price series for HFUL, so there is nothing to compare it against.

HFUL vs VTI Performance

New Age Alpha UK Leading ETF (HFUL) is an ETF from New Age Alpha and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US).

Fees and Cost Over Time

HFUL charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of HFUL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

HFULVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HFUL or VTI?

HFUL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Is VTI better than HFUL?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.