HIBL vs VTI
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, HIBL or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. HIBL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VTI over 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HIBL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $77M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.36% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 216 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +37.16%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +62.97%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +53.75%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.38% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 87.8% | 17.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -88.4% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,276 | $17,616Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.9 years).
HIBL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.9 years both funds cover.
HIBL vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HIBL returned +62.97% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, HIBL is up 37.16% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, HIBL compounded at +53.75% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.38% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, HIBL has the edge at +15.65% annualized vs +14.79%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HIBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 87.8% compared with 17.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.4% for HIBL and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HIBL charges 0.98% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HIBL currently yields 1.36% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 32.0% of VTI's money is in holdings HIBL also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for HIBL, our book for it lists positions totalling 106.1% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
93 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in HIBL and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 216 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HIBL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.65% | 6.88% | 6.23% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.47% | 3.41% | 2.94% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.60% | 2.38% | 1.78% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.31% | 1.46% | 0.15% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.44% | 2.12% | 1.68% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.35% | 1.04% | 0.31% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.58% | 1.70% | 1.12% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.82% | 1.40% | 0.58% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 1.80% | 0.31% | 1.49% |
| MRNAModerna therapeutics | 1.68% | 0.07% | 1.61% |
32.0% of VTI is already inside HIBL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HIBL or VTI?
HIBL has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HIBL or VTI?
Over the past year HIBL returned +62.97% vs +16.63% for VTI, so HIBL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HIBL annualized +15.65% vs +14.79% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HIBL or VTI?
HIBL has been the more volatile fund at 87.8% annualized versus 17.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: HIBL -88.4% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both HIBL and VTI?
HIBL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HIBL and VTI?
At least 32.0% of VTI's money is in holdings HIBL also owns. Our book for HIBL is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 93 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in HIBL and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, HIBL or VTI?
HIBL yields 1.36% while VTI yields 1.06%, so HIBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than HIBL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. HIBL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VTI over 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.