HLTH vs IVV
Tema Healthcare AI ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, HLTH or IVV?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HLTH | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 33 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +8.95% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.6% | 38.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 21, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
HLTH vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HLTH vs IVV Performance
Tema Healthcare AI ETF (HLTH) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, HLTH is up 8.95% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HLTH charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HLTH currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
25.1% of HLTH's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.9% of IVV's money is in holdings HLTH also owns.
HLTH and IVV share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in HLTH and 506 in IVV, against full books of 33 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 494 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for HLTH (98.5% of the fund), and 26 for HLTH that do not appear in IVV (73.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
25.1% of HLTH is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HLTH or IVV?
HLTH has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between HLTH and IVV?
25.1% of HLTH's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.9% of IVV's is in holdings HLTH also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in HLTH and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, HLTH or IVV?
HLTH yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than HLTH?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.