HRSK vs QLTY
Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, HRSK or QLTY?
QLTY costs less.
QLTY has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HRSK | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $35M | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 121 | 90 |
| YTD Return | +0.16% | +15.19%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.45% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.21% |
| Fund Family | TOEWS Funds | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2026 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
HRSK vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HRSK vs QLTY Performance
Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF (HRSK) is an ETF from TOEWS Funds and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Year to date, HRSK is up 0.16% versus a gain of 15.19% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HRSK charges 0.95% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $50 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HRSK currently yields 0.00% against 0.66% for QLTY.
Holdings Overlap
At least 56.1% of QLTY's money is in holdings HRSK also owns.
Stated as a floor: for HRSK, our book for it covers 58.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 117 positions we hold weights for in HRSK and 45 in QLTY, against full books of 121 and 90.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HRSK | Weight in QLTY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.50% | 8.00% | 5.50% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.03% | 4.20% | 1.17% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.48% | 3.70% | 0.22% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 0.73% | 4.90% | 4.17% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.64% | 4.80% | 4.16% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.31% | 3.30% | 1.99% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.96% | 3.50% | 2.54% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 0.07% | 4.20% | 4.13% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.19% | 2.80% | 2.61% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.52% | 2.40% | 1.88% |
56.1% of QLTY is already inside HRSK.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HRSK or QLTY?
HRSK has an expense ratio of 0.95% while QLTY charges 0.50%. QLTY is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between HRSK and QLTY?
At least 56.1% of QLTY's money is in holdings HRSK also owns. Our book for HRSK is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 117 positions we hold weights for in HRSK and 45 in QLTY.
Which pays a higher dividend, HRSK or QLTY?
HRSK yields 0.00% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so QLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than HRSK?
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.