HRSK vs SCHX
Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF vs Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
Which is better, HRSK or SCHX?
SCHX costs less.
SCHX has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HRSK | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $35M | $75.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 121 | 752 |
| YTD Return | +0.16% | +13.46%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.48% |
| Fund Family | TOEWS Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2026 | Nov 3, 2009 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
HRSK vs SCHX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HRSK vs SCHX Performance
Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF (HRSK) is an ETF from TOEWS Funds and Schwab US Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, HRSK is up 0.16% versus a gain of 13.46% for SCHX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HRSK charges 0.95% per year while SCHX charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HRSK currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for SCHX.
Holdings Overlap
At least 61.5% of SCHX's money is in holdings HRSK also owns.
Stated as a floor: for HRSK, our book for it covers 58.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
99 positions in common, counted across the 117 positions we hold weights for in HRSK and 752 in SCHX, against full books of 121 and 752.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HRSK | Weight in SCHX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.03% | 6.90% | 3.87% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.31% | 8.02% | 6.71% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.50% | 5.44% | 2.94% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.48% | 2.40% | 1.08% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.96% | 3.50% | 2.54% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 0.73% | 2.86% | 2.13% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.64% | 2.28% | 1.64% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.37% | 1.25% | 0.12% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.30% | 2.29% | 1.99% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.03% | 1.72% | 1.69% |
61.5% of SCHX is already inside HRSK.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HRSK or SCHX?
HRSK has an expense ratio of 0.95% while SCHX charges 0.03%. SCHX is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between HRSK and SCHX?
At least 61.5% of SCHX's money is in holdings HRSK also owns. Our book for HRSK is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 99 positions in common, counted across the 117 positions we hold weights for in HRSK and 752 in SCHX.
Which pays a higher dividend, HRSK or SCHX?
HRSK yields 0.00% while SCHX yields 1.04%, so SCHX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHX better than HRSK?
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.