HRTS vs RWLC
Tema Heart & Health ETF vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF
Which is better, HRTS or RWLC?
RWLC has been ahead.
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HRTS | RWLC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.32%Best |
| AUM | $53M | $100M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.30% | 12.70% |
| Holdings | 92 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +2.75% | +18.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.59% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.00% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.3% | 37.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 20, 2023 | Dec 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
HRTS vs RWLC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HRTS vs RWLC Performance
Tema Heart & Health ETF (HRTS) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Year to date, HRTS is up 2.75% versus a gain of 18.51% for RWLC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HRTS charges 0.75% per year while RWLC charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $32 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HRTS currently yields 1.30% against 12.70% for RWLC.
Holdings Overlap
35.4% of HRTS's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 9.1% of RWLC's money is in holdings HRTS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in HRTS and 101 in RWLC, against full books of 92 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 89 positions for RWLC that do not appear in our book for HRTS (89.7% of the fund), and 28 for HRTS that do not appear in RWLC (47.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HRTS | Weight in RWLC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 11.51% | 1.93% | 9.58% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 3.28% | 1.97% | 1.31% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 4.67% | 0.16% | 4.51% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 4.37% | 0.36% | 4.01% |
| MCKMckesson Corp. | 1.99% | 1.71% | 0.28% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.48% | 1.09% | 1.39% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 2.92% | 0.18% | 2.74% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.15% | 0.55% | 1.60% |
| REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 1.04% | 0.85% | 0.19% |
| CNCCentene | 0.94% | 0.31% | 0.63% |
35.4% of HRTS is already inside RWLC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HRTS or RWLC?
HRTS has an expense ratio of 0.75% while RWLC charges 0.32%. RWLC is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between HRTS and RWLC?
35.4% of HRTS's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 9.1% of RWLC's is in holdings HRTS also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in HRTS and 101 in RWLC.
Which pays a higher dividend, HRTS or RWLC?
HRTS yields 1.30% while RWLC yields 12.70%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWLC better than HRTS?
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.