HRTS vs ZIG
Tema Heart & Health ETF vs The Acquirers Fund ETF
Which is better, HRTS or ZIG?
HRTS has been ahead.
HRTS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ZIG is less concentrated, with 34.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HRTS | ZIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Tie | 0.75%Tie |
| AUM | $53M | $31M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.30% | 1.84% |
| Holdings | 92 | 97 |
| YTD Return | +5.27% | +8.11%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.80%Best | +10.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.93%Best | +10.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.07% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1%Best | 17.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.7%Best | -29.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $14,597Best | $13,201 |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.3% | 34.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | Acquirers Funds, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 20, 2023 | May 14, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 21, 2023 to Oct 15, 2026 (2.9 years).
HRTS vs ZIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
HRTS vs ZIG Performance
Tema Heart & Health ETF (HRTS) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited and The Acquirers Fund ETF (ZIG) is an ETF from Acquirers Funds, LLC. Over the past year HRTS returned +16.80% while ZIG returned +10.31%. Year to date, HRTS is up 5.27% versus a gain of 8.11% for ZIG.
Over three years, HRTS compounded at +13.93% per year against +10.81% for ZIG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 17.1% for HRTS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.7% for HRTS and -29.8% for ZIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HRTS charges 0.75% per year while ZIG charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $75 annually. On income, HRTS currently yields 1.30% against 1.84% for ZIG.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of HRTS's money is in holdings ZIG also owns. 0.1% of ZIG's money is in holdings HRTS also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in HRTS and 32 in ZIG, against full books of 92 and 97.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 31 positions for ZIG that do not appear in our book for HRTS (99.9% of the fund), and 37 for HRTS that do not appear in ZIG (82.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HRTS | Weight in ZIG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FXFXXFirst Am Treas Obli-X | 0.69% | 0.08% | 0.61% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HRTS and ZIG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HRTS or ZIG?
HRTS has an expense ratio of 0.75% while ZIG charges 0.75%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, HRTS or ZIG?
Over the past year HRTS returned +16.80% vs +10.31% for ZIG, so HRTS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HRTS or ZIG?
ZIG has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 17.1% for HRTS. Worst drawdown: HRTS -24.7% vs ZIG -29.8%.
Should I hold both HRTS and ZIG?
HRTS and ZIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, HRTS or ZIG?
HRTS yields 1.30% while ZIG yields 1.84%, so ZIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZIG better than HRTS?
HRTS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ZIG is less concentrated, with 34.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.