HUSV vs JPEF
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF vs JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF
Which is better, HUSV or JPEF?
JPEF has been ahead.
JPEF has a lower expense ratio. JPEF led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. HUSV is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HUSV | JPEF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $54M | $2.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 0.64% |
| Holdings | 202 | 84 |
| YTD Return | +5.79% | +9.64%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.42% | +11.56%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.84% | +19.60%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.65% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.4%Best | 12.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.3%Best | -18.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $12,849 | $16,604Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.7%Best | 45.8% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2016 | Mar 10, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 31, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.2 years).
HUSV vs JPEF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
HUSV vs JPEF Performance
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF (JPEF) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year HUSV returned +3.42% while JPEF returned +11.56%. Year to date, HUSV is up 5.79% versus a gain of 9.64% for JPEF.
Over three years, HUSV compounded at +9.84% per year against +19.60% for JPEF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JPEF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 10.4% for HUSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.3% for HUSV and -18.1% for JPEF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HUSV charges 0.70% per year while JPEF charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $44 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HUSV currently yields 1.52% against 0.64% for JPEF.
Holdings Overlap
15.6% of HUSV's money is in holdings JPEF also owns. 40.3% of JPEF's money is in holdings HUSV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in HUSV and 41 in JPEF, against full books of 202 and 84.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 27 positions for JPEF that do not appear in our book for HUSV (58.0% of the fund), and 86 for HUSV that do not appear in JPEF (82.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HUSV | Weight in JPEF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 1.94% | 9.59% | 7.65% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 2.27% | 5.69% | 3.42% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 1.94% | 3.08% | 1.14% |
| LLoews Corp. | 2.39% | 2.49% | 0.10% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.90% | 3.24% | 2.34% |
| PGProcter & Gamble | 1.09% | 2.12% | 1.03% |
| MTBM&t Bank Corp. | 0.74% | 2.41% | 1.67% |
| ECLEcolab, Inc. | 0.73% | 2.24% | 1.51% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp | 0.37% | 2.56% | 2.19% |
| GILDGild Gilead Sciences Inc. | 0.38% | 2.55% | 2.17% |
40.3% of JPEF is already inside HUSV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HUSV or JPEF?
HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while JPEF charges 0.44%. JPEF is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HUSV or JPEF?
Over the past year HUSV returned +3.42% vs +11.56% for JPEF, so JPEF leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HUSV or JPEF?
JPEF has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 10.4% for HUSV. Worst drawdown: HUSV -9.3% vs JPEF -18.1%.
Should I hold both HUSV and JPEF?
HUSV and JPEF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HUSV and JPEF?
40.3% of JPEF's money is in holdings HUSV also owns. 40.3% of JPEF's is in holdings HUSV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in HUSV and 41 in JPEF.
Which pays a higher dividend, HUSV or JPEF?
HUSV yields 1.52% while JPEF yields 0.64%, so HUSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JPEF better than HUSV?
JPEF has a lower expense ratio. JPEF led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. HUSV is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.