HUSV vs NUDG

HUSV vs NUDG

Which is better, HUSV or NUDG?

NUDG has been ahead.

NUDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y. HUSV is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%.

Lower Fees: NUDGHigher Returns (1Y): NUDGLess Concentrated: HUSV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHUSVNUDG
Expense Ratio0.70%0.61%Best
AUM$54M$6.2B
Dividend Yield1.52%0.50%
Holdings20243
YTD Return+5.79%Best+2.67%
1Y Return+3.42%-
3Y Return (annualized)+9.84%-
5Y Return (annualized)+5.65%-
Top 10 Weight22.7%Best42.3%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Nuveen
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 24, 2016Jun 2, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

HUSV vs NUDG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare HUSV against instead:HUSV vs SPYHUSV vs QQQHUSV vs VOOHUSV vs VTINUDG against:NUDG vs VXUS

HUSV vs NUDG Performance

First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, HUSV is up 5.79% versus a gain of 2.67% for NUDG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HUSV charges 0.70% per year while NUDG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $61 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HUSV currently yields 1.52% against 0.50% for NUDG.

Holdings Overlap

HUSV already in NUDG12.6%
NUDG already in HUSV26.3%

12.6% of HUSV's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. 26.3% of NUDG's money is in holdings HUSV also owns.

NUDG and HUSV share little of their money.

12 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in HUSV and 42 in NUDG, against full books of 202 and 43.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 29 positions for NUDG that do not appear in our book for HUSV (68.2% of the fund), and 87 for HUSV that do not appear in NUDG (85.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HUSVWeight in NUDGDifference
AAPLApple, Inc2.27%6.37%4.10%
MSIMotorola Solutions, Inc2.23%2.21%0.02%
ADIAnalog Devices, Inc.1.94%1.84%0.10%
WECWec Energy Group Inc.1.29%1.95%0.66%
MCDMcdonald'S Corp1.27%1.65%0.38%
TJXTjx Cos., Inc.0.94%1.81%0.87%
XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd0.37%2.01%1.64%
ABTAbbot Laboratories0.29%2.07%1.78%
CVXChevron Corp0.61%1.66%1.05%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.0.36%1.89%1.53%

26.3% of NUDG is already inside HUSV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

HUSVNUDG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HUSV or NUDG?

HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while NUDG charges 0.61%. NUDG is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between HUSV and NUDG?

26.3% of NUDG's money is in holdings HUSV also owns. 26.3% of NUDG's is in holdings HUSV also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in HUSV and 42 in NUDG.

Which pays a higher dividend, HUSV or NUDG?

HUSV yields 1.52% while NUDG yields 0.50%, so HUSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NUDG better than HUSV?

NUDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y. HUSV is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.