HUSV vs SCHX
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF vs Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
Which is better, HUSV or SCHX?
SCHX has been ahead.
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. SCHX led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HUSV is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HUSV | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $54M | $75.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 202 | 752 |
| YTD Return | +5.79% | +13.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.42% | +16.62%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.84% | +22.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.65% | +12.56%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,163 | $18,068Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.7%Best | 36.9% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2016 | Nov 3, 2009 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 25, 2016 to Oct 14, 2026 (10.1 years).
HUSV vs SCHX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.1 years both funds cover.
HUSV vs SCHX Performance
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Schwab US Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year HUSV returned +3.42% while SCHX returned +16.62%. Year to date, HUSV is up 5.79% versus a gain of 13.08% for SCHX.
Over three years, HUSV compounded at +9.84% per year against +22.27% for SCHX; over five years the annualized figures are +5.65% and +12.56% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SCHX has the edge at +14.03% annualized vs +8.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 13.3% for HUSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for HUSV and -34.3% for SCHX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HUSV charges 0.70% per year while SCHX charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HUSV currently yields 1.52% against 1.04% for SCHX.
Holdings Overlap
99.1% of HUSV's money is in holdings SCHX also owns. 31.0% of SCHX's money is in holdings HUSV also owns.
Most of HUSV is already inside SCHX. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
100 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in HUSV and 752 in SCHX, against full books of 202 and 752.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 630 positions for SCHX that do not appear in our book for HUSV (68.3% of the fund), and 0 for HUSV that do not appear in SCHX (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HUSV | Weight in SCHX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.94% | 8.02% | 6.08% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.27% | 6.90% | 4.63% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 2.56% | 1.33% | 1.23% |
| REGRegency Centers Corp. | 2.49% | 0.02% | 2.47% |
| LLoews Corp | 2.39% | 0.02% | 2.37% |
| AFLAflac Inc. | 2.30% | 0.07% | 2.23% |
| FRTFederal Realty Investment Trust | 2.33% | 0.01% | 2.32% |
| MSIMotorola Solutions, Inc | 2.23% | 0.10% | 2.13% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.70% | 0.63% | 1.07% |
| ORealty Income Corp. | 2.16% | 0.07% | 2.09% |
99.1% of HUSV is already inside SCHX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HUSV or SCHX?
HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while SCHX charges 0.03%. SCHX is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HUSV or SCHX?
Over the past year HUSV returned +3.42% vs +16.62% for SCHX, so SCHX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), HUSV annualized +8.08% vs +14.03% for SCHX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HUSV or SCHX?
SCHX has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 13.3% for HUSV. Worst drawdown: HUSV -35.7% vs SCHX -34.3%.
Should I hold both HUSV and SCHX?
HUSV and SCHX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HUSV and SCHX?
99.1% of HUSV's money is in holdings SCHX also owns. 31.0% of SCHX's is in holdings HUSV also owns. They hold 100 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in HUSV and 752 in SCHX.
Which pays a higher dividend, HUSV or SCHX?
HUSV yields 1.52% while SCHX yields 1.04%, so HUSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHX better than HUSV?
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. SCHX led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HUSV is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.