HWGV vs IGA

HWGV vs IGA

Which is better, HWGV or IGA?

HWGV costs less.

HWGV has a lower expense ratio. IGA is less concentrated, with 18.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.6%.

Lower Fees: HWGVLess Concentrated: IGA

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHWGVIGA
Expense Ratio0.70%Best0.97%
AUM$5M$168M
Dividend Yield0.00%9.48%
Holdings60251
YTD Return+0.16%+11.75%Best
1Y Return-+12.51%
3Y Return (annualized)-+19.10%
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.70%
Top 10 Weight29.6%18.4%Best
Fund FamilyHotchkis & Wiley FundsVoya Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionAug 27, 2026Oct 26, 2005

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

HWGV vs IGA growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare HWGV against instead:HWGV vs SPYHWGV vs QQQHWGV vs VOOHWGV vs VTIIGA against:IGA vs VXUS

HWGV vs IGA Performance

Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund ETF (HWGV) is an ETF from Hotchkis & Wiley Funds and Voya Global Advantage and Premium Opportunity Fund (IGA) is an ETF from Voya Investment Management. Year to date, HWGV is up 0.16% versus a gain of 11.75% for IGA.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HWGV charges 0.70% per year while IGA charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $97 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HWGV currently yields 0.00% against 9.48% for IGA.

Holdings Overlap

HWGV already in IGA20.5%
IGA already in HWGV4.6%

20.5% of HWGV's money is in holdings IGA also owns. 4.6% of IGA's money is in holdings HWGV also owns.

HWGV and IGA share little of their money.

12 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in HWGV and 237 in IGA, against full books of 60 and 251.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 134 positions for IGA that do not appear in our book for HWGV (65.7% of the fund), and 26 for HWGV that do not appear in IGA (47.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HWGVWeight in IGADifference
ELVElevance Health Inc2.97%0.32%2.65%
CICigna Corp.2.59%0.60%1.99%
MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares2.27%0.71%1.56%
USBUS Bancorp1.95%0.77%1.18%
HEIO:ASHeineken N.V. Ordinary Shares2.13%0.07%2.06%
CCitigroup Inc.0.99%0.74%0.25%
QCOMQualcomm Inc.1.17%0.50%0.67%
AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC1.55%0.04%1.51%
GMGeneral Motors Co1.40%0.18%1.22%
GSK:LNGsk Plc Sponsored Adr (1 Ads : 2 Ordinary)1.48%0.06%1.42%

20.5% of HWGV is already inside IGA.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

HWGVIGA

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HWGV or IGA?

HWGV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while IGA charges 0.97%. HWGV is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between HWGV and IGA?

20.5% of HWGV's money is in holdings IGA also owns. 4.6% of IGA's is in holdings HWGV also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in HWGV and 237 in IGA.

Which pays a higher dividend, HWGV or IGA?

HWGV yields 0.00% while IGA yields 9.48%, so IGA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IGA better than HWGV?

HWGV has a lower expense ratio. IGA is less concentrated, with 18.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 29.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.