HWO vs VFVA

HWO vs VFVA

Which is better, HWO or VFVA?

VFVA has been ahead.

VFVA has a lower expense ratio. VFVA led over 1Y. VFVA is less concentrated, with 7.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.

Lower Fees: VFVAHigher Returns (1Y): VFVALess Concentrated: VFVA

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHWOVFVA
Expense Ratio0.90%0.13%Best
AUM$532,756.73$897M
Dividend Yield0.00%1.90%
Holdings53693
YTD Return+5.80%+15.66%Best
1Y Return-+22.16%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.81%
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.70%
Top 10 Weight45.5%7.5%Best
Fund FamilyHotchkis & Wiley FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap ValueMid Cap Value
InceptionJul 22, 2026Feb 13, 2018

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

HWO vs VFVA growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare HWO against instead:HWO vs SPYHWO vs QQQHWO vs VOOHWO vs VTIVFVA against:VFVA vs VXUS

HWO vs VFVA Performance

Hotchkis & Wiley Opportunities Fund ETF (HWO) is an ETF from Hotchkis & Wiley Funds and Vanguard US Value Factor ETF (VFVA) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, HWO is up 5.80% versus a gain of 15.66% for VFVA.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HWO charges 0.90% per year while VFVA charges 0.13%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $13 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HWO currently yields 0.00% against 1.90% for VFVA.

Holdings Overlap

HWO already in VFVA33.7%
VFVA already in HWO6.5%

33.7% of HWO's money is in holdings VFVA also owns. 6.5% of VFVA's money is in holdings HWO also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

22 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in HWO and 691 in VFVA, against full books of 53 and 693.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 651 positions for VFVA that do not appear in our book for HWO (90.9% of the fund), and 22 for HWO that do not appear in VFVA (47.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HWOWeight in VFVADifference
SLMSlm Corp3.77%0.15%3.62%
PPGPpg Industries Inc.3.25%0.03%3.22%
CICigna Corp.2.19%0.73%1.46%
APAApa Corp2.73%0.11%2.62%
AIGAmerican International Gr2.39%0.31%2.08%
COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.012.12%0.57%1.55%
OVVOvintiv Inc.2.38%0.29%2.09%
GEHCGe Healthcare Technologies Inc2.21%0.04%2.17%
ELVElevance Health Inc1.60%0.61%0.99%
WFCWells Fargo & Co.1.53%0.43%1.10%

33.7% of HWO is already inside VFVA.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

HWOVFVA

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HWO or VFVA?

HWO has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VFVA charges 0.13%. VFVA is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between HWO and VFVA?

33.7% of HWO's money is in holdings VFVA also owns. 6.5% of VFVA's is in holdings HWO also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in HWO and 691 in VFVA.

Which pays a higher dividend, HWO or VFVA?

HWO yields 0.00% while VFVA yields 1.90%, so VFVA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VFVA better than HWO?

VFVA has a lower expense ratio. VFVA led over 1Y. VFVA is less concentrated, with 7.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.