HYPG vs IVV

HYPG vs IVV

Which is better, HYPG or IVV?

We do not have enough on HYPG and IVV to separate them.

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHYPGIVV
Expense Ratio-0.03%
AUM$190M$896.5B
Dividend Yield0.20%1.10%
Holdings1508
YTD Return+11.09%+13.59%Best
1Y Return-+17.54%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.28%
Fund FamilyGrayscaleiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleSingle CurrencyLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 3, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

HYPG vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

HYPG vs IVV Performance

Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF (HYPG) is an ETF from Grayscale and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, HYPG is up 11.09% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of HYPG and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

HYPGIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which pays a higher dividend, HYPG or IVV?

HYPG yields 0.20% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than HYPG?

We hold very little data on HYPG and IVV, so there is not enough here to separate them. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.