IAUG vs IJUL

IAUG vs IJUL

Which is better, IAUG or IJUL?

IJUL has been ahead.

IJUL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: IJUL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIAUGIJUL
Expense Ratio0.85%Tie0.85%Tie
AUM$77M$253M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1818
YTD Return+5.56%+7.31%Best
1Y Return+8.42%+10.36%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+12.40%
5Y Return (annualized)-+8.04%
Volatility (annualized)6.3%Best6.8%
Max Drawdown-8.0%Best-8.3%
$10,000 over 2.2 years$12,325$12,801Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionJul 31, 2024Jun 28, 2019

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 1, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026 (2.2 years).

IAUG vs IJUL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.

Compare IAUG against instead:IAUG vs SPYIAUG vs QQQIAUG vs VOOIAUG vs VTIIJUL against:IJUL vs VXUS

IAUG vs IJUL Performance

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - August (IAUG) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IAUG returned +8.42% while IJUL returned +10.36%. Year to date, IAUG is up 5.56% versus a gain of 7.31% for IJUL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IJUL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.8% compared with 6.3% for IAUG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.0% for IAUG and -8.3% for IJUL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IAUG charges 0.85% per year while IJUL charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, IAUG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for IJUL.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IAUG and IJUL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IAUGIJUL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IAUG or IJUL?

IAUG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while IJUL charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, IAUG or IJUL?

Over the past year IAUG returned +8.42% vs +10.36% for IJUL, so IJUL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IAUG annualized +9.97% vs +11.88% for IJUL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IAUG or IJUL?

IJUL has been the more volatile fund at 6.8% annualized versus 6.3% for IAUG. Worst drawdown: IAUG -8.0% vs IJUL -8.3%.

Should I hold both IAUG and IJUL?

IAUG and IJUL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IAUG or IJUL?

IAUG yields 0.00% while IJUL yields 0.00%, so IJUL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IJUL better than IAUG?

IJUL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.