IBFR vs VXUS
Innovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, IBFR or VXUS?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBFR | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 2.34% |
| Holdings | 647 | 8,844 |
| YTD Return | -0.68% | +10.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.55% |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IBFR vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IBFR vs VXUS Performance
Innovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETF (IBFR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, IBFR is down 0.68% versus a gain of 10.00% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBFR charges 0.85% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $5 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBFR currently yields 0.92% against 2.34% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 63.1% of IBFR's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 91.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
205 positions in common, counted across the 293 positions we hold weights for in IBFR and 8,425 in VXUS, against full books of 647 and 8,844.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IBFR | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHELShell Plc | 1.32% | 0.56% | 0.76% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag – Class N | 1.24% | 0.62% | 0.62% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 1.15% | 0.55% | 0.60% |
| SIE:SGSiemens N Ag | 1.07% | 0.53% | 0.54% |
| AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC | 1.05% | 0.53% | 0.52% |
| BHP:AUBhp Group Ltd | 0.97% | 0.33% | 0.64% |
| TTE:PATotal Fina Elf Holdings Usa, Inc. | 0.92% | 0.37% | 0.55% |
| CBA:AUCommonwealth Bank Of Australia | 0.85% | 0.42% | 0.43% |
| SU:PASchneider Electric | 0.85% | 0.40% | 0.45% |
| UBSG:SMUbs Group Ag | 0.84% | 0.37% | 0.47% |
63.1% of IBFR is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBFR or VXUS?
IBFR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $80 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IBFR and VXUS?
At least 63.1% of IBFR's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 205 positions in common, counted across the 293 positions we hold weights for in IBFR and 8,425 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBFR or VXUS?
IBFR yields 0.92% while VXUS yields 2.34%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than IBFR?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.