IBMU vs VOO
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Muni Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IBMU or VOO?
VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBMU | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $29M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 501 | 506 |
| YTD Return | -2.38% | +13.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.55% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 25, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IBMU vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IBMU vs VOO Performance
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMU) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, IBMU is down 2.38% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBMU charges 0.18% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBMU currently yields 1.07% against 1.06% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 122 holdings in IBMU and 504 in VOO, totalling 19.9% and 100.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 122 positions we hold weights for in IBMU and 504 in VOO, against full books of 501 and 506.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IBMU and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBMU or VOO?
IBMU has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBMU or VOO?
IBMU yields 1.07% while VOO yields 1.06%, so IBMU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than IBMU?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.