IDX vs MOO
VanEck Indonesia Index ETF vs VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Which is better, IDX or MOO?
MOO has been ahead.
MOO has a lower expense ratio. MOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IDX is less concentrated, with 50.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDX | MOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.56%Best |
| AUM | $34M | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.23% | 2.20% |
| Holdings | 138 | 51 |
| YTD Return | -38.14% | +11.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | -34.20% | +16.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -13.75% | +4.13%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -11.22% | -0.90%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.6% | 18.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -63.2% | -41.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $5,515 | $9,558Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.0%Best | 56.9% |
| Fund Family | VanEck | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 15, 2009 | Aug 31, 2007 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 20, 2009 to Oct 14, 2026 (17.7 years).
IDX vs MOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.7 years both funds cover.
IDX vs MOO Performance
VanEck Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) is an ETF from VanEck and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year IDX returned -34.20% while MOO returned +16.95%. Year to date, IDX is down 38.14% versus a gain of 11.54% for MOO.
Over three years, IDX compounded at -13.75% per year against +4.13% for MOO; over five years the annualized figures are -11.22% and -0.90% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, MOO has the edge at +8.46% annualized vs +3.40%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 18.2% for MOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.2% for IDX and -41.5% for MOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDX charges 0.57% per year while MOO charges 0.56%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $56 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDX currently yields 3.23% against 2.20% for MOO.
Holdings Overlap
0.9% of IDX's money is in holdings MOO also owns. 0.4% of MOO's money is in holdings IDX also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in IDX and 47 in MOO, against full books of 138 and 51.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for MOO that do not appear in our book for IDX (54.2% of the fund), and 0 for IDX that do not appear in MOO (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IDX | Weight in MOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPIN:IDCharoen Pokphand Indonesia Tbk Pt | 0.93% | 0.39% | 0.54% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IDX and MOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDX or MOO?
IDX has an expense ratio of 0.57% while MOO charges 0.56%. MOO is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IDX or MOO?
Over the past year IDX returned -34.20% vs +16.95% for MOO, so MOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), IDX annualized +3.40% vs +8.46% for MOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IDX or MOO?
IDX has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 18.2% for MOO. Worst drawdown: IDX -63.2% vs MOO -41.5%.
Should I hold both IDX and MOO?
IDX and MOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDX or MOO?
IDX yields 3.23% while MOO yields 2.20%, so IDX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MOO better than IDX?
MOO has a lower expense ratio. MOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IDX is less concentrated, with 50.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.