IDYN vs PPIE
iShares International Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF vs Putnam PanAgora ESG International Equity ETF
Which is better, IDYN or PPIE?
PPIE has been ahead.
IDYN has a lower expense ratio. PPIE led over 1Y. IDYN is less concentrated, with 20.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDYN | PPIE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $114M | $4M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.83% | 12.07% |
| Holdings | 218 | 142 |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.9%Best | 26.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Putnam Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 5, 2025 | Jan 19, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 127 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IDYN has data through Oct 14, 2026 and PPIE through Jun 9, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDYN charges 0.45% per year while PPIE charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $49 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDYN currently yields 1.83% against 12.07% for PPIE.
Holdings Overlap
22.5% of IDYN's money is in holdings PPIE also owns. 32.6% of PPIE's money is in holdings IDYN also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 196 days apart, IDYN as of Sep 11, 2026 and PPIE as of Feb 27, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
34 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in IDYN and 137 in PPIE, against full books of 218 and 142.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 3 positions for PPIE that do not appear in our book for IDYN (4.8% of the fund), and 7 for IDYN that do not appear in PPIE (3.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IDYN | Weight in PPIE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 4.17% | 3.63% | 0.54% |
| TSCO:LNTesco Plc | 1.17% | 2.92% | 1.75% |
| 8001:JPItochu Corp | 1.18% | 2.37% | 1.19% |
| 6758:JPSony Group Corp. | 0.24% | 2.80% | 2.56% |
| 8031:TKMitsui & Co., Ltd | 1.33% | 1.42% | 0.09% |
| SIE:SGSiemens Ag | 0.91% | 1.65% | 0.74% |
| III:LN3I Group PLC | 0.41% | 2.10% | 1.69% |
| 9433:JPKddi Corp | 0.98% | 1.07% | 0.09% |
| BNP:PABnp Paribas Sa | 1.17% | 0.71% | 0.46% |
| S32:AUSouth32 Limited Ordinary Shares | 1.23% | 0.61% | 0.62% |
32.6% of PPIE is already inside IDYN.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDYN or PPIE?
IDYN has an expense ratio of 0.45% while PPIE charges 0.49%. IDYN is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IDYN and PPIE?
32.6% of PPIE's money is in holdings IDYN also owns. 32.6% of PPIE's is in holdings IDYN also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in IDYN and 137 in PPIE.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDYN or PPIE?
IDYN yields 1.83% while PPIE yields 12.07%, so PPIE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PPIE better than IDYN?
IDYN has a lower expense ratio. PPIE led over 1Y. IDYN is less concentrated, with 20.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.