IFEB vs IJUL
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February vs Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July
Which is better, IFEB or IJUL?
IJUL has been ahead.
IJUL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IFEB | IJUL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $56M | $253M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 18 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +2.74% | +6.69%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.03% | +9.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.19% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0%Best | 7.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.8% | -8.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $12,374 | $13,200Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Feb 1, 2024 | Jun 28, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.7 years).
IFEB vs IJUL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
IFEB vs IJUL Performance
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IFEB returned +6.03% while IJUL returned +9.74%. Year to date, IFEB is up 2.74% versus a gain of 6.69% for IJUL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IJUL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.3% compared with 7.0% for IFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.8% for IFEB and -8.3% for IJUL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IFEB charges 0.85% per year while IJUL charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, IFEB currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for IJUL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IFEB and IJUL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IFEB or IJUL?
IFEB has an expense ratio of 0.85% while IJUL charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, IFEB or IJUL?
Over the past year IFEB returned +6.03% vs +9.74% for IJUL, so IJUL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IFEB or IJUL?
IJUL has been the more volatile fund at 7.3% annualized versus 7.0% for IFEB. Worst drawdown: IFEB -8.8% vs IJUL -8.3%.
Should I hold both IFEB and IJUL?
IFEB and IJUL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IFEB or IJUL?
IFEB yields 0.00% while IJUL yields 0.00%, so IJUL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IJUL better than IFEB?
IJUL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.