IGF vs RIFR
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Which is better, IGF or RIFR?
Nearly the same fund. IGF costs less.
IGF has a lower expense ratio. RIFR led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. RIFR is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGF | RIFR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $10.5B | $45M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.14% | 0.95% |
| Holdings | 94 | 69 |
| YTD Return | +3.13% | +6.89%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.02% | +7.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.80% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.59% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1%Best | 12.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.4% | -9.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $11,342 | $11,497Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.3% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 10, 2007 | May 13, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
IGF vs RIFR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
IGF vs RIFR Performance
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year IGF returned +5.02% while RIFR returned +7.00%. Year to date, IGF is up 3.13% versus a gain of 6.89% for RIFR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RIFR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 11.1% for IGF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for IGF and -9.3% for RIFR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGF charges 0.37% per year while RIFR charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $59 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGF currently yields 3.14% against 0.95% for RIFR.
Holdings Overlap
43.9% of IGF's money is in holdings RIFR also owns. 42.1% of RIFR's money is in holdings IGF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in IGF and 61 in RIFR, against full books of 94 and 69.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 14 positions for RIFR that do not appear in our book for IGF (17.5% of the fund), and 17 for IGF that do not appear in RIFR (19.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IGF | Weight in RIFR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AENA:MAAena Sme Sa | 4.91% | 5.88% | 0.97% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 4.69% | 4.98% | 0.29% |
| TCL:AUTransurban Group | 4.89% | 4.27% | 0.62% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 2.61% | 3.56% | 0.95% |
| AIA:NZAuckland International Airport Limited | 3.68% | 1.73% | 1.95% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 2.98% | 2.39% | 0.59% |
| NG:LNNational Grid Plc | 2.22% | 2.89% | 0.67% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 2.11% | 2.38% | 0.27% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 1.94% | 2.31% | 0.37% |
| ADP:PAAeroports De Paris | 2.13% | 2.11% | 0.02% |
43.9% of IGF is already inside RIFR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGF or RIFR?
IGF has an expense ratio of 0.37% while RIFR charges 0.59%. IGF is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IGF or RIFR?
Over the past year IGF returned +5.02% vs +7.00% for RIFR, so RIFR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IGF annualized +9.41% vs +10.48% for RIFR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IGF or RIFR?
RIFR has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 11.1% for IGF. Worst drawdown: IGF -10.4% vs RIFR -9.3%.
Should I hold both IGF and RIFR?
IGF and RIFR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IGF and RIFR?
43.9% of IGF's money is in holdings RIFR also owns. 42.1% of RIFR's is in holdings IGF also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in IGF and 61 in RIFR.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGF or RIFR?
IGF yields 3.14% while RIFR yields 0.95%, so IGF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RIFR better than IGF?
IGF has a lower expense ratio. RIFR led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. RIFR is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.