IGLD vs QLTY
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, IGLD or QLTY?
QLTY has been ahead.
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGLD | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $596M | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 24.76% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 10 | 90 |
| YTD Return | -15.99% | +14.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | -11.90% | +20.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.23% | +21.84%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.02% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.8% | -17.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $15,518 | $17,733Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 2, 2021 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 15, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
IGLD vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
IGLD vs QLTY Performance
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Over the past year IGLD returned -11.90% while QLTY returned +20.95%. Year to date, IGLD is down 15.99% versus a gain of 14.13% for QLTY.
Over three years, IGLD compounded at +16.23% per year against +21.84% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IGLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 11.9% for QLTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.8% for IGLD and -17.0% for QLTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGLD charges 0.85% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $50 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGLD currently yields 24.76% against 0.66% for QLTY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IGLD and QLTY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGLD or QLTY?
IGLD has an expense ratio of 0.85% while QLTY charges 0.50%. QLTY is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IGLD or QLTY?
Over the past year IGLD returned -11.90% vs +20.95% for QLTY, so QLTY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IGLD or QLTY?
IGLD has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 11.9% for QLTY. Worst drawdown: IGLD -29.8% vs QLTY -17.0%.
Should I hold both IGLD and QLTY?
IGLD and QLTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGLD or QLTY?
IGLD yields 24.76% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so IGLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than IGLD?
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.