IINC vs VTI
Alki Consolidated Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IINC or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IINC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $33M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.61% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 121 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +2.87% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Fund Family | Hohimer Wealth Management, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IINC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IINC vs VTI Performance
Alki Consolidated Income ETF (IINC) is an ETF from Hohimer Wealth Management, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, IINC is up 2.87% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IINC charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IINC currently yields 2.61% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 3.2% of VTI's money is in holdings IINC also owns.
Stated as a floor: for IINC, our book for it covers 93.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and IINC share little of their money.
39 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in IINC and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 121 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IINC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 1.30% | 0.44% | 0.86% |
| WSOWatsco Inc | 1.67% | 0.01% | 1.66% |
| MCDMcdonald'S Corp | 1.38% | 0.25% | 1.13% |
| WMGWarner Music Group Corp | 1.56% | 0.01% | 1.55% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 1.30% | 0.25% | 1.05% |
| ABTAbbot Laboratories | 1.29% | 0.26% | 1.03% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 1.29% | 0.26% | 1.03% |
| NKENike Inc | 1.48% | 0.06% | 1.42% |
| PYPLPaypal Holdings Inc | 1.47% | 0.06% | 1.41% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 1.36% | 0.11% | 1.25% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IINC and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IINC or VTI?
IINC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IINC and VTI?
At least 3.2% of VTI's money is in holdings IINC also owns. Our book for IINC is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in IINC and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IINC or VTI?
IINC yields 2.61% while VTI yields 1.06%, so IINC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IINC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.