IJAN vs ISEP

IJAN vs ISEP

Which is better, IJAN or ISEP?

ISEP has been ahead.

ISEP led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: ISEP

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIJANISEP
Expense Ratio0.85%Tie0.85%Tie
AUM$229M$106M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1818
YTD Return+5.80%+6.49%Best
1Y Return+9.08%+9.60%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+11.40%+12.60%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+7.25%-
Volatility (annualized)7.9%7.6%Best
Max Drawdown-10.3%-7.4%Best
$10,000 over 3.1 years$13,328$13,924Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionJan 1, 2020Sep 1, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 1, 2023 to Oct 15, 2026 (3.1 years).

IJAN vs ISEP growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.

Compare IJAN against instead:IJAN vs SPYIJAN vs QQQIJAN vs VOOIJAN vs VTIISEP against:ISEP vs VXUS

IJAN vs ISEP Performance

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January (IJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - September (ISEP) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IJAN returned +9.08% while ISEP returned +9.60%. Year to date, IJAN is up 5.80% versus a gain of 6.49% for ISEP.

Over three years, IJAN compounded at +11.40% per year against +12.60% for ISEP.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IJAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.9% compared with 7.6% for ISEP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.3% for IJAN and -7.4% for ISEP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IJAN charges 0.85% per year while ISEP charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, IJAN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for ISEP.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IJAN and ISEP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IJANISEP

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IJAN or ISEP?

IJAN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while ISEP charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, IJAN or ISEP?

Over the past year IJAN returned +9.08% vs +9.60% for ISEP, so ISEP leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IJAN or ISEP?

IJAN has been the more volatile fund at 7.9% annualized versus 7.6% for ISEP. Worst drawdown: IJAN -10.3% vs ISEP -7.4%.

Should I hold both IJAN and ISEP?

IJAN and ISEP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IJAN or ISEP?

IJAN yields 0.00% while ISEP yields 0.00%, so ISEP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ISEP better than IJAN?

ISEP led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.