IJT vs VIOG
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P Small Cap 600 Growth ETF
Which is better, IJT or VIOG?
Nearly the same fund. VIOG costs less.
VIOG has a lower expense ratio. VIOG led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IJT | VIOG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.10%Best |
| AUM | $7.6B | $1.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.78% | 0.79% |
| Holdings | 770 | 353 |
| YTD Return | +12.16% | +12.42%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.75% | +13.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.62% | +14.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.63% | +4.72%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4%Tie | 18.4%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -42.9% | -42.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,540 | $12,594Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 9.8%Tie | 9.8%Tie |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Small Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2000 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Oct 14, 2026 (16.1 years).
IJT vs VIOG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.1 years both funds cover.
IJT vs VIOG Performance
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P Small Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IJT returned +13.75% while VIOG returned +13.95%. Year to date, IJT is up 12.16% versus a gain of 12.42% for VIOG.
Over three years, IJT compounded at +14.62% per year against +14.81% for VIOG; over five years the annualized figures are +4.63% and +4.72% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VIOG has the edge at +11.55% annualized vs +11.44%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IJT and VIOG have been equally volatile, both at 18.4% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.9% for IJT and -42.8% for VIOG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IJT charges 0.18% per year while VIOG charges 0.10%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $10 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IJT currently yields 0.78% against 0.79% for VIOG.
Holdings Overlap
98.0% of IJT's money is in holdings VIOG also owns. 98.4% of VIOG's money is in holdings IJT also owns.
Most of VIOG is already inside IJT. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
343 positions in common, counted across the 349 positions we hold weights for in IJT and 350 in VIOG, against full books of 770 and 353.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 3 positions for VIOG that do not appear in our book for IJT (0.6% of the fund), and 3 for IJT that do not appear in VIOG (1.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IJT | Weight in VIOG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FORMFormfactor, Inc. | 1.40% | 1.39% | 0.01% |
| VSATViasat Inc | 1.17% | 1.18% | 0.01% |
| PTGXProtagonist Therapeutics Inc | 1.09% | 1.08% | 0.01% |
| RHPRyman Hospitality Properties | 1.00% | 0.99% | 0.01% |
| TGTXTg Therapeutics Inc Common Stock | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.00% |
| SNEXStonex Group Inc | 0.86% | 0.85% | 0.01% |
| ESEEsco Technologies Inc | 0.84% | 0.85% | 0.01% |
| ZWSZurn Elkay Water Solutions | 0.84% | 0.84% | 0.00% |
| FSSFederal Signal Corp | 0.83% | 0.85% | 0.02% |
| MSGSMadison Square Garden Co/the | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.00% |
98.4% of VIOG is already inside IJT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IJT or VIOG?
IJT has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VIOG charges 0.10%. VIOG is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IJT or VIOG?
Over the past year IJT returned +13.75% vs +13.95% for VIOG, so VIOG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IJT annualized +11.44% vs +11.55% for VIOG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IJT or VIOG?
IJT and VIOG have been equally volatile, both at 18.4% annualized. Worst drawdown: IJT -42.9% vs VIOG -42.8%.
Should I hold both IJT and VIOG?
IJT and VIOG have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IJT and VIOG?
98.4% of VIOG's money is in holdings IJT also owns. 98.4% of VIOG's is in holdings IJT also owns. They hold 343 positions in common, counted across the 349 positions we hold weights for in IJT and 350 in VIOG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IJT or VIOG?
IJT yields 0.78% while VIOG yields 0.79%, so VIOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VIOG better than IJT?
VIOG has a lower expense ratio. VIOG led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.